Re: [PATCH 0/5] mfd: replace IORESOURCE_IO by IORESOURCE_MEM

From: Mark Brown
Date: Mon Aug 06 2012 - 11:58:02 EST


On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:56:47PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Mark Brown

> > Right, but _MEM isn't terribly relevant either. If anything _IO is a
> > bit better as ioports are *somewhat* similar to registers.

> The problem is that each bit is already used in 32-bit IORESOURCE. I can't
> find a empty bit to define the new IORESOURCE.

That's one reason why I've not attacked this problem myself, but frankly
I'm totally happy with using _IO here so I've not looked particularly
closely.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/