Re: [PATCH v6 6/8] fsl-dma: use spin_lock_bh to instead of spin_lock_irqsave

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Monday 06 August 2012, qiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> From: Qiang Liu <qiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The use of spin_lock_irqsave() is a stronger locking mechanism than is
> required throughout the driver. The minimum locking required should be
> used instead. Interrupts will be turned off and context will be saved,
> there is needless to use irqsave.
> 
> Change all instances of spin_lock_irqsave() to spin_lock_bh().
> All manipulation of protected fields is done using tasklet context or
> weaker, which makes spin_lock_bh() the correct choice.
> 
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Li Yang <leoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Qiang Liu <qiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Ira W. Snyder <iws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

You could actually change the use of spin_lock_bh inside of the tasklet
function (dma_do_tasklet) do just spin_lock(), because softirqs are
already disabled there, but your version is also ok.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/