Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] I2C: SIS964: Bus driver

From: Amaury DecrÃme
Date: Fri Aug 03 2012 - 12:37:19 EST


Hi Jean,

>
> What is the rationale for not adding support for the new chip to
> i2c-sis630 then? That would probably be a lot easier to review.
>

I was afraid that adding SIS964 support to i2c-sis630 would lead
to confusion.

I can try to submit a patch for i2c-sis630. In this case, do you think
we should keep the 630 name or change it to something else to
avoid misunderstanding ?


>
> This split makes little sense. Integration should come with the driver,
> otherwise even build-testing is impossible.
>

Sorry for that. As the patch V1 was rather big, I was hesitating for
the same reason but posted it split. I'll "unsplit" for the V3 (unless
i2c-sis630 patch).


Amaury DecrÃme
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/