Re: [PATCH 4/9] KVM: define kvm_bad_pfn statically

From: Paul Mackerras
Date: Thu Aug 02 2012 - 20:01:22 EST


On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 10:15:27AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

> Remind me what is the guarantee that -Exxx does not clash with
> a valid pfn number?

A pfn number is an address >> PAGE_SHIFT, so it will have the top 12
(at least) bits clear, whereas -Exxx will have the top bit set.

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/