Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add control statement test toSINGLE_STATEMENT_DO_WHILE_MACRO

[Andy Whitcroft]

On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:26:53AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:

> The patch below is tested with:
> $ cat t.c
> 
> #define bar_1(foo)				\
> 	if (foo)				\
> 		baz();				\
> 
> #define bar_2(foo)				\
> do {						\
> 	if (foo)				\
> 		baz();				\
> } while (0)
> 
> #define bar_3(foo)				\
> do {						\
> 	baz();					\
> } while (0)
> 
> #define bar_4(foo)				\
> do {						\
> 	baz();					\
> } while (0);
> 
> #define bar_5(foo)				\
> do {						\
> 	while (foo)				\
> 		baz();				\
> } while (0)
> 
> #define bar_6(foo)				\
> do {						\
> 	switch (foo) {				\
> 	case 1:					\
> 		baz();				\
> 	}					\
> } while (0)
> 
> $
> 
> So perhaps...
> 
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 913d6bd..ca05ba2 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -3016,7 +3016,8 @@ sub process {
>  					$herectx .= raw_line($linenr, $n) . "\n";
>  				}
>  
> -				if (($stmts =~ tr/;/;/) == 1) {
> +				if (($stmts =~ tr/;/;/) == 1 &&
> +				    $stmts !~ /^\s*(if|while|for|switch)\b/) {
>  					WARN("SINGLE_STATEMENT_DO_WHILE_MACRO",
>  					     "Single statement macros should not use a do {} while (0) loop\n" . "$herectx");
>  				}
> 
> 

Looks reasonable enough.

Acked-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/