Re: [PATCH] mfd: arizona: simplify use of shared IRQ

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:37:35PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:

> One outstanding issue with this change is that it removes the pm_runtime
> calls from the interrupt handler thread. Equivalent code should presumably
> be added to regmap_irq_thread(). However, I haven't attempted this yet
> since I understand some pm_runtime support has already been added to
> regmap, so don't want to duplicate anything, although I haven't seen
> those changes yet to be sure.

This would cause massive breakage if applied as is due to the above
issue (the device won't have physical I/O when handling most interrupts)
and now that I think about it future work means that I'd actually prefer
to keep the code as-is for now anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/