Re: [RFC v2] ARM: sched_clock: update epoch_cyc on resume

From: Linus Walleij
Date: Fri Jul 27 2012 - 19:32:44 EST


On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Colin Cross <ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Many clocks that are used to provide sched_clock will reset during
> suspend. If read_sched_clock returns 0 after suspend, sched_clock will
> appear to jump forward. This patch resets cd.epoch_cyc to the current
> value of read_sched_clock during resume, which causes sched_clock() just
> after suspend to return the same value as sched_clock() just before
> suspend.
>
> In addition, during the window where epoch_ns has been updated before
> suspend, but epoch_cyc has not been updated after suspend, it is unknown
> whether the clock has reset or not, and sched_clock() could return a
> bogus value. Add a suspended flag, and return the pre-suspend epoch_ns
> value during this period.
>
> The new behavior is triggered by calling setup_sched_clock_needs_suspend
> instead of setup_sched_clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Sweet!
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/