Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] PM / shmobile: Pass power domain information via DT (was: Re: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, July 26, 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:38:35PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> 
> > That being said, I'm not sure why ti,hwmods is being used as an example
> > for powerdomains.  hwmods describe the integration of SoC IP blocks
> > (base addr, IRQ, DMA channel etc., which are being moved to DT) as well
> > as a bunch of SoC specific PM register descriptions.  This stuff is
> > SoC-specific PM register layout, so being very SoC specific, it has the
> > 'ti' prefix in the DT binding.
> 
> I think the thing here is that one aspect of that SoC integration is
> which power domain the blocks are in.  Describing which power domain an
> IP is in isn't a million miles away from describing which hwmod applies
> to an IP.

I agree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/