Re: [PATCH 00/34] Memory management performance backports for-stable V2

[Mel Gorman]

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 03:30:57PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > <SNIP>
> > All of the patches will apply to 3.0-stable but the ordering of the
> > patches is such that applying them to 3.2-stable and 3.4-stable should
> > be straight-forward.
> 
> I can't find any of these that should have gone to 3.4-stable, given
> that they all were included in 3.4 already, right?
> 

Yes, you're right.

At the time I wrote the changelog I had patches belonging to 3.5 included. I
later decided to drop them until after 3.5 was out. It was potentially
weird to have a 3.0-stable kernel with patches that were not in a released
3.x.0 kernel. Besides, they were very low priority. I forgot to update
the changelog to match.

> I've queued up the whole lot for the 3.0-stable tree, thanks so much for
> providing them.
> 

Thanks for reviewing them in detail and getting the flaws corrected.
I expect it'll be a bit more smooth if/when I do something like this again.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/