Re: [PATCH] add blockconsole version 1.1

From: JÃrn Engel
Date: Wed Jul 25 2012 - 13:52:51 EST


On Wed, 25 July 2012 09:17:09 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> As far as I know there is nothing like netpoll in the block layer so it has to
> be a lot less reliable than netconsole. Especially with delaying write out to
> a workqueue. Anyway, I am not arguing, just saying in my opinion those caveats
> are worth documenting.
...
> My point was that it's reliability will differ depending on the block device
> in use, which is unlike netconsole. Again I am not arguing against the
> feature, but if you don't see things like these are worth documenting I give
> up.

I have nothing against documenting things. Can you suggest something
better than "reliability of blockconsole will depend on the
reliability of the underlying storage layer", which sounds rather
obvious?

JÃrn

--
I don't understand it. Nobody does.
-- Richard P. Feynman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/