Re: [RFC] Simplifying kernel configuration for distro issues
From: David Greaves
Date: Sun Jul 22 2012 - 16:29:43 EST
On 18/07/12 10:55, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> The point I'm slowly getting to is that I would actually love to have
>> *distro* Kconfig-files, where the distribution would be able to say
>> "These are the minimums I *require* to work". So we'd have a "Distro"
>> submenu, where you could pick the distro(s) you use, and then pick
>> which release, and we'd have something like
> As someone working on one of the smaller distributions (Arch), I think
> it would be even better if rather than having "distro" entries, we'd
> have "application" entries. I.e., entries for applications that have
> specific kernel requirements/suggestions (udev, systemd, upstart,
> bootchart, pulseaudio, networkmanager, etc). If applications have soft
> requirements, they could have sub-entries explaining the benefit of
> enabling each.
Also coming from a 'very small distro' position; I had this problem a few months
ago... my solution was this:
So I'd appreciate something very much along the lines of what various low-level
services need and why since that way we can share work between distros and
package maintainers and offer this kind of ability to our users too.
"Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/