Re: [PATCH 08/36] AArch64: Kernel booting and initialisation

[Jon Masters]

On 07/18/2012 05:07 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 07:57:47AM +0100, Jon Masters wrote:
>> On 07/06/2012 05:05 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>
>>> +- CPU mode
>>> +  All forms of interrupts must be masked in PSTATE.DAIF (Debug, SError,
>>> +  IRQ and FIQ).
>>> +  The CPU must be in either EL2 (RECOMMENDED) or non-secure EL1.
>>
>> Even though this stuff is likely to be replaced with the result of some
>> of the other standardization, I'd like it if you'd strongly consider
>> removing the "or non-secure EL1". If you give an inch, someone will take
>> a mile and build a system that enters other than in EL2. Or, something
>> to the effect of "the highest non-secure exception level implemented"
>> would be my preference if you don't want to specify.
> 
> The reason we allow kernels to boot at non-secure EL1 is because we require
> that for booting Linux as a guest OS under a hypervisor.

Good point. Found brain on switch after I wrote that (was only thinking
from the point of view of the hypervisor itself, not the guest).

Jon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/