Re: [PATCH 5/9] KVM: MMU: fask check write-protect for direct mmu
From: Xiao Guangrong
Date: Thu Jul 19 2012 - 23:46:32 EST
BTW, they are some bug fix patches on -master branch, but
it is not existed on -next branch:
It causes code conflict if we do the development on -next.
On 07/20/2012 08:39 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:can
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:53:29PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> If it have no indirect shadow pages we need not protect any gfn,
>> this is always true for direct mmu without nested
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> What is the motivation? Numbers please.
> In fact, what case was the original indirect_shadow_pages conditional in
> kvm_mmu_pte_write optimizing again?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/