Re: [Bug 3.4.5] reiserfs: mutex_destroy called with locked mutex
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Wed Jul 18 2012 - 17:25:22 EST
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:26:57AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> So I don't think the freeing code could trigger, but a concurrent
>> lookup then trying to look up the new directory (and taking the new
>> directory i_semaphore lock) could happen, afaik.
> Umm... The thing is, we'd get WARN_ON() in iput_final() triggering in
> that scenario before lockdep could complain.
Not for the "look up directory in the dcache, and then lock that
inode" case, afaik. You'd get the lock before iput_final(), no?
So then "unlock_new_inode()" would run with the inode mutex held,
which could explain the lockdep warning, no?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/