Re: [PATCH 01/36] atomic64_test: Simplify the #ifdef foratomic64_dec_if_positive() test

From: Catalin Marinas
Date: Wed Jul 18 2012 - 05:06:45 EST


On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 05:33:57AM +0100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 22:05 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > This patch introduces ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE and uses this
> > instead of the multitude of #if defined() checks in atomic64_test.c
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
>
> I'll let other paint the bike shed as to whether ARCH_HAS_* is the right
> thing here, but as far as the powerpc change is concerned:
>
> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks Ben. I followed Andrew's feedback to some other patches that Will
posted and moved the #define to Kconfig:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/17/382

I don't have any strong preference.

--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/