Re: Kerneloops.org defunct?

[Anton Arapov]

On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 11:02 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> >   The reporting tool(Abrt) complicated the reporting and kerneloops.org
> > DNS still doesn't associated with the required ip address. ( Arjan? )
> Anton - just talk to the kernel.org maintainers and get oops.kernel.org
> set up somewhere and be done with it.

I like the idea of oops.kernel.org name. I will speak to the folks. I
wanted old dns in order to get(possibly) the reports from the clients
that have old name in configs.

> >   - Starting from the Fedora 18 kernel oopses reporting will be
> > configured to send reports unconditionally, straight to the
> > kerneloops.org as it did the original tool.
> > (this, hopefully, will fix the volume of the oopses we are getting.)
> And probably the volume of complaints about spyware. It should be asking
> permission even if "until further notice" is a choice.
Absolutely. 

> For some environments this is a major issue. Consider people with ARM or
> x86 prototype machines who are contractually forbidden from revealing a
> lot of data about the systems.
*nod*

thanks!
Anton.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/