Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: vfp: Always save VFP state in vfp_pm_suspend on UP

From: Colin Cross
Date: Mon Jul 16 2012 - 15:42:54 EST


On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Nicolas Pitre
<nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Colin Cross wrote:
>
>> vfp_pm_suspend should save the VFP state in suspend after
>> any lazy context switch. If it only saves when the VFP is enabled,
>> the state can get lost when, on a UP system:
>> Thread 1 uses the VFP
>> Context switch occurs to thread 2, VFP is disabled but the
>> VFP context is not saved
>> Thread 2 initiates suspend
>> vfp_pm_suspend is called with the VFP disabled, and the unsaved
>> VFP context of Thread 1 in the registers
>>
>> Modify vfp_pm_suspend to save the VFP context whenever
>> vfp_current_hw_state is not NULL.
>>
>> Includes a fix from Ido Yariv <ido@xxxxxxxxxx>, who pointed out that on
>> SMP systems, the state pointer can be pointing to a freed task struct if
>> a task exited on another cpu, fixed by using #ifdef CONFIG_SMP in the
>> new if clause.
>>
>> Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Barry Song <bs14@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ido Yariv <ido@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c | 6 ++++++
>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
>> index 58696192..ce55f05 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
>> @@ -457,6 +457,12 @@ static int vfp_pm_suspend(void)
>>
>> /* disable, just in case */
>> fmxr(FPEXC, fmrx(FPEXC) & ~FPEXC_EN);
>> + } else if (vfp_current_hw_state[ti->cpu]) {
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
>> + fmxr(FPEXC, fpexc | FPEXC_EN);
>> + vfp_save_state(vfp_current_hw_state[ti->cpu], fpexc);
>> + fmxr(FPEXC, fpexc);
>> +#endif
>> }
>
> Couldn't vfp_sync_hwstate() be used here instead?

Not easily, we don't have the thread struct of the thread that is in
the vfp hardware. We would have to read vfp_current_hw_state for the
current cpu and use container_of to get from struct vfpstate to
struct thread_info, and then pass that back in to vfp_sync_hwstate.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/