Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpumask: cpumask_scnprintf() comments correction

From: Alex Shi
Date: Mon Jul 16 2012 - 04:29:00 EST

On 07/16/2012 03:40 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:

> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:35:54 +0800, Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The function has no parameter @len now, so need to remove it from
>> comments to avoid kernel-doc warning:
> But it still does in my tree.
> Please push this patch via whoever changed it?
> Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Sorry, my fault, the commit log used a wrong function name, it is cpulist_parse()
not cpumask_scnprntf. and find a new error in the comments: used a incorrect
function name: cpulist_parse_user(), the correct one is cpulist_parse().
Fix it in updated patch.

Both errors appear in Rusty's commit 29c0177e6a4.