Re: [PATCH 01/10] random: make 'add_interrupt_randomness()' dosomething sane

From: Theodore Ts'o
Date: Fri Jul 06 2012 - 12:53:17 EST


On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 09:24:00AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > What in the world is "fast count"? I've grepped for it,
> > and I can't find it.
>
> It's your own fast-pool counter that Matt was talking about.

When he said "check it against HZ", it confused me, since there's no
way to compare it against HZ. But yes, I can certainly not give any
credit for entropy if __IRQF_TIMER is set, or keep track of whether
the previous interrupt had __IRQF_TIMER set in its descriptor. That's
simple enough.

I thought he was saying there was some way to distinguish between
interrupts triggered by the clock interrupt versus other devices on
the same irq channel --- and I couldn't figure out any to do that in
an architecture independent way.

- Ted

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/