Re: [PATCH 03/16] sched: aggregate load contributed by taskentities on parenting cfs_rq

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Fri Jul 06 2012 - 10:53:38 EST


On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 17:28 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 19:24 -0700, Paul Turner wrote:
> > For a given task t, we can compute its contribution to load as:
> > task_load(t) = runnable_avg(t) * weight(t)
> >
> > On a parenting cfs_rq we can then aggregate
> > runnable_load(cfs_rq) = \Sum task_load(t), for all runnable children t
> >
> > Maintain this bottom up, with task entities adding their contributed load to
> > the parenting cfs_rq sum. When a task entities load changes we add the same
> > delta to the maintained sum.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> A lot of patches have this funny sob trail.. Ben never send me these
> patches, so uhm. ?
>
> Should that be Reviewed-by, or what is the deal with those?

Ben could you clarify what your exact contribution was?

Ingo, supposing Ben is co-author and wrote a significant part of the
patch, what are we supposed to do with these tags?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/