Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND] mm: cma: add a simple kernel module as thehelper to test CMA

From: Barry Song
Date: Thu Jul 05 2012 - 04:44:46 EST


Hi Arnd,

2012/7/5 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>:
>
> I think it should be in mm/cma-test.c, along with kmemleak-test.c. It would be nice
> if you could add some code that just runs at boot time (or when the module is
> loaded) and allocates and frees memory using CMA.
>
>> +static struct device *cma_dev;
>
> Do you actually need this device? It's not connected to hardware so
> it doesn't actually do DMA and we might as well pass a NULL pointer
> into dma_alloc_*().
>
>> +static const struct file_operations cma_test_fops = {
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + .read = cma_test_read,
>> + .write = cma_test_write,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct miscdevice cma_test_misc = {
>> + .name = "cma_test",
>> + .fops = &cma_test_fops,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init cma_test_init(void)
>> +{
>> + int ret = misc_register(&cma_test_misc);
>
> A better place for this is really debugfs. The driver is not meant as a stable
> kernel interface that applications can rely on, it's purely a debugging help.
>
> Just make this
>
> ret = debugfs_create_file("cma-test", 0600, NULL, NULL, &cma_test_fops);
>

we did have some discussions about this at:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg163548.html

i'd say both are acceptable to me.

> Arnd
>

-barry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/