[PATCH] mm/memcg: replace inexistence move_lock_page_cgroup() by move_lock_mem_cgroup() in comment

[Wanpeng Li]

From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 3d318f6..63e36e7 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1899,7 +1899,7 @@ again:
 		return;
 	/*
 	 * If this memory cgroup is not under account moving, we don't
-	 * need to take move_lock_page_cgroup(). Because we already hold
+	 * need to take move_lock_mem_cgroup(). Because we already hold
 	 * rcu_read_lock(), any calls to move_account will be delayed until
 	 * rcu_read_unlock() if mem_cgroup_stolen() == true.
 	 */
@@ -1921,7 +1921,7 @@ void __mem_cgroup_end_update_page_stat(struct page *page, unsigned long *flags)
 	/*
 	 * It's guaranteed that pc->mem_cgroup never changes while
 	 * lock is held because a routine modifies pc->mem_cgroup
-	 * should take move_lock_page_cgroup().
+	 * should take move_lock_mem_cgroup().
 	 */
 	move_unlock_mem_cgroup(pc->mem_cgroup, flags);
 }
-- 
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/