Re: [PATCH] leds: heartbeat: fix bug on panic
From: Bryan Wu
Date: Wed Jul 04 2012 - 03:06:09 EST
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Alexander Holler <holler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> With commit 49dca5aebfdeadd4bf27b6cb4c60392147dc35a4 I introduced
> a bug (visible if CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled) which occures when a panic
> has happened:
>
> [ 1526.520230] ===============================
> [ 1526.520230] [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
> [ 1526.520230] 3.5.0-rc1+ #12 Not tainted
> [ 1526.520230] -------------------------------
> [ 1526.520230] /c/kernel-tests/mm/include/linux/rcupdate.h:436 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
> [ 1526.520230]
> [ 1526.520230] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 1526.520230]
> [ 1526.520230]
> [ 1526.520230] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
> [ 1526.520230] 3 locks held by net.agent/3279:
> [ 1526.520230] #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff82f85962>] do_page_fault+0x193/0x390
> [ 1526.520230] #1: (panic_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff82ed2830>] panic+0x37/0x1d3
> [ 1526.520230] #2: (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff810b9b28>] rcu_lock_acquire+0x0/0x29
> [ 1526.520230]
> [ 1526.520230] stack backtrace:
> [ 1526.520230] Pid: 3279, comm: net.agent Not tainted 3.5.0-rc1+ #12
> [ 1526.520230] Call Trace:
> [ 1526.520230] [<ffffffff810e1570>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x109/0x112
> [ 1526.520230] [<ffffffff810bfe3a>] rcu_preempt_sleep_check+0x45/0x47
> [ 1526.520230] [<ffffffff810bfe5a>] __might_sleep+0x1e/0x19a
> [ 1526.520230] [<ffffffff82f8010e>] down_write+0x26/0x81
> [ 1526.520230] [<ffffffff8276a966>] led_trigger_unregister+0x1f/0x9c
> [ 1526.520230] [<ffffffff8276def5>] heartbeat_reboot_notifier+0x15/0x19
> [ 1526.520230] [<ffffffff82f85bf5>] notifier_call_chain+0x96/0xcd
> [ 1526.520230] [<ffffffff82f85cba>] __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x8e/0xff
> [ 1526.520230] [<ffffffff81094b7c>] ? kmsg_dump+0x37/0x1eb
> [ 1526.520230] [<ffffffff82f85d3f>] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x16
> [ 1526.520230] [<ffffffff82ed28e1>] panic+0xe8/0x1d3
> [ 1526.520230] [<ffffffff811473e2>] out_of_memory+0x15d/0x1d3
>
> So in case of a panic, now just turn of the LED. Other approaches like
> scheduling a work to unregister the trigger aren't working because there
> isn't much which still runs after a panic occured (except timers).
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler <holler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/leds/ledtrig-heartbeat.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/ledtrig-heartbeat.c b/drivers/leds/ledtrig-heartbeat.c
> index 41dc76d..a019fbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/ledtrig-heartbeat.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/ledtrig-heartbeat.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
> #include <linux/reboot.h>
> #include "leds.h"
>
> +static int panic_heartbeats;
> +
> struct heartbeat_trig_data {
> unsigned int phase;
> unsigned int period;
> @@ -34,6 +36,11 @@ static void led_heartbeat_function(unsigned long data)
> unsigned long brightness = LED_OFF;
> unsigned long delay = 0;
>
> + if (unlikely(panic_heartbeats)) {
> + led_set_brightness(led_cdev, LED_OFF);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> /* acts like an actual heart beat -- ie thump-thump-pause... */
> switch (heartbeat_data->phase) {
> case 0:
> @@ -111,12 +118,19 @@ static int heartbeat_reboot_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> }
>
> +static int heartbeat_panic_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned long code, void *unused)
> +{
> + panic_heartbeats = 1;
Can we just set LED as OFF and delete the timer here? because timer is
also useless after a kernel panic.
So we don't need this global static variable here.
-Bryan
> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +}
> +
> static struct notifier_block heartbeat_reboot_nb = {
> .notifier_call = heartbeat_reboot_notifier,
> };
>
> static struct notifier_block heartbeat_panic_nb = {
> - .notifier_call = heartbeat_reboot_notifier,
> + .notifier_call = heartbeat_panic_notifier,
> };
>
> static int __init heartbeat_trig_init(void)
> --
> 1.7.6.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/