Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] xen/hvc: Fix up checks when theinfo is allocated.

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 03.07.12 at 17:40, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Coverity would complain about this - even thought it looks OK.
> 
> CID 401957
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c |   15 ++++++---------
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
> index 944eaeb..fbf41be 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
> @@ -209,10 +209,8 @@ static int xen_hvm_console_init(void)
>  		info = kzalloc(sizeof(struct xencons_info), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
>  		if (!info)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* already configured */
> -	if (info->intf != NULL)
> +	} else if (info->intf != NULL) {
> +		/* already configured */
>  		return 0;

Is this patch perhaps stale? There appears to be a missing } here,
without which I can't see how this would have built, ...

>  	/*
>  	 * If the toolstack (or the hypervisor) hasn't set these values, the
> @@ -220,6 +218,7 @@ static int xen_hvm_console_init(void)
>  	 * theoretically correct values, in practice they never are and they
>  	 * mean that a legacy toolstack hasn't initialized the pv console correctly.
>  	 */
> +	 */

... and this one likely wouldn't build either.

Jan

>  	r = hvm_get_parameter(HVM_PARAM_CONSOLE_EVTCHN, &v);
>  	if (r < 0 || v == 0)
>  		goto err;
> @@ -259,12 +258,10 @@ static int xen_pv_console_init(void)
>  		info = kzalloc(sizeof(struct xencons_info), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
>  		if (!info)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* already configured */
> -	if (info->intf != NULL)
> +	} else if (info->intf != NULL) {
> +		/* already configured */
>  		return 0;
> -
> +	}
>  	info->evtchn = xen_start_info->console.domU.evtchn;
>  	info->intf = mfn_to_virt(xen_start_info->console.domU.mfn);
>  	info->vtermno = HVC_COOKIE;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/