RE: [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate

[Doug Smythies]

>> On 2012.06.22 07:03 -0700, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>  On 2012.06.24 14:46 -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:

>> Doug, Charles,

>> Can you both confirm that the below patch is what you tested and we
>> should finally be able to close this issue?

> [... patch code deleted ...]

> Yes, I confirm that is the patch code I am testing, back edited to my
> working environment (So far, I call this "peter35").

> Some more test results are attached as PNG files and tests will
> continue for at least another couple of days. I can comment
> further on the "finally close this issue" question then, but it
> looks very good so far.

> Unless I find some issue, I won't push further results to this list,
> But results can be pulled from [1].

> [1] http://www.smythies.com/~doug/network/load_average/peter35.html

I have finished my testing of Peter's proposed patch (my reference:
"peter35")
I don't claim that the testing was exhaustive, but I do claim that it was
pretty thorough.

Yes, In my opinion, we can finally close this issue.
Thanks.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/