Re: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: Fix runtime warning caused by duplicate deviceregistration

From: Lee Jones
Date: Tue Jul 03 2012 - 09:48:27 EST


On 03/07/12 14:24, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 02:07:45PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
On 03/07/12 13:35, Mark Brown wrote:

Do we really want to create MFD cells like this (which are really Linux
internal things and might vary if another OS or another version of Linux
changes its internal abstractions) from the device tree?

We're not creating them. We're merely using current infrastructure.

*Very* recently added infrastructure which caused you to notice this...

No, I mean the MFD method is current infrastructure.

Using it with DT is new, yes.

Before, when we probed each device from Device Tree we came up
against some fairly major limitations of the Device Tree. As a
result, Arnd and I agreed that this was the way to go.

I'm really unconvinced that instnatiating the MFD cells from device tree
is in general a good idea.

Well it just doesn't work the other way.

See c5395e7ed8f16cc7bb72a783de68659db5aed515 for a short description
of the troubles we faced.

$ git show c5395e7ed8f16cc7bb72a783de68659db5aed515
fatal: bad object c5395e7ed8f16cc7bb72a783de68659db5aed515

Sorry, looks live I've rebased since.

5f3fc8adeec9bb12742fbfa777fa1947deda21a2

--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/