Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] Potential fix for leapsecond caused futex issue(v2)

[Dave Jones]

On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 09:12:59PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
 > On 07/01/2012 11:29 AM, John Stultz wrote:
 > > TODOs:
 > > * Chase down the futex/hrtimer interaction to see if this could
 > > be triggered in any other way.
 > > * Get Tglx's input/ack
 > > * Generate a backport for pre-v3.4 kernels
 > So while still waiting for feedback on the clock_was_set() change, I 
 > went ahead and generated backports for most of the stable kernels on 
 > kernel.org.
 > 
 > Clearly these shouldn't go anywhere until the fix is upstream, but since 
 > I assume there's a number of distro developers who are likely under 
 > pressure to have a fix soon, I wanted to make them available so no one 
 > is duplicating work.
 > 
 > You can find them here:
 > http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/jstultz/linux.git;a=summary
 > 
 > I did boot and test each of those kernels with my leaptest-timer.c test 
 > successfully.

I'm curious how the test that I did with the kernel patch,
or Richard Cochran's userspace test program didn't trigger this bug
when we tested last week.

any ideas what we missed ?

	Dave
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/