RE: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/irq: handle chained interrupts during IRQmigration

[Iyer, Sundar]

Hi Thomas/Paul,

Any comments on the latest patch set?

Thanks

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Mundt [mailto:lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 11:02 AM
>To: Iyer, Sundar
>Cc: tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Monroy,
>German
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/irq: handle chained interrupts during IRQ migration
>
>On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:25:07AM +0530, Sundar Iyer wrote:
>> Chained interrupt handlers dont have an irqaction and hence are not
>> handled during migrating interrupts when some cores go offline.
>>
>> Handle this by introducing a irq_is_chained() check which is based on
>> the the CHAINED flag being set for such interrupts. fixup_irq() can
>> then handle such interrupts and not skip them over.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sundar Iyer <sundar.iyer@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Yang, Fei <fei.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Tested-by: Ng, Cheon-woei <cheon-woei.ng@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>Looks better to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/