Re: [RFC patch] BFS: 421-1

[Emmanuel Benisty]

On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Heinz Diehl <htd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01.07.2012, Hillf Danton wrote:
>
>> With 15 patches collected, the 421-1 is ready with iso untouched.
>> Note diff is based not on 420 but on 421.
> [....]
>
> There is no v.421 on ck.kolivas.org, and it seems it never has
> been, at least there is a patch which updates v.420 directly to v.422
> which indicates that there isn't any v.421. So what version is your
> patchset actually based on?

Con skipped 421 because Hillf did release a 421 BFS, he wanted to
avoid confusion. There are two patches in this thread, the first one
is based on Hillf's 421 (you can find the patch on lkml) and a second
one based on Con's 420 BFS. Hope it's a bit more clear now.

@Hillf, 421-1 builds and boots fine. Too early for me to give any
feedback on improvements and/or regressions this patch brings.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/