Re: should there still be arch-specific 4KSTACKS support?

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Broadening the audience...

On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Âvia some convoluted logic, i ended up doing the following search:
>
> $ grep -r 4KSTACKS *
> arch/sh/configs/r7785rp_defconfig:CONFIG_4KSTACKS=y
> arch/sh/Kconfig.debug:config 4KSTACKS
> arch/sh/include/asm/thread_info.h:#if defined(CONFIG_4KSTACKS)
> arch/mn10300/include/asm/thread_info.h:#ifdef CONFIG_4KSTACKS
> arch/m68k/Kconfig.machine:config 4KSTACKS
> arch/m68k/configs/m5208evb_defconfig:# CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not set
> arch/m68k/configs/m5275evb_defconfig:# CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not set
> arch/m68k/configs/m5475evb_defconfig:# CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not set
> arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h:#ifdef CONFIG_4KSTACKS
> arch/c6x/include/asm/thread_info.h:#ifdef CONFIG_4KSTACKS
> drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c: Â * Depending on the CONFIG_4KSTACKS option, the Guest can have one or
> kernel/lockdep.c: Â Â Â Â* hardirq contexts (such as on 4KSTACKS), so only
> $
>
> Âso even though 4KSTACKS support was officially removed in June of
> 2010:
>
> $ git show dcfa7262
>
> there's still traces of it, some of it obviously harmless, leftover
> cruft, but it would appear that both sh and m68k still provide a
> 4KSTACKS config option.
>
> Âhow much of that can be tossed as useless?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

            Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
             Â Â -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/