Re: SNB PCI root information
From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Tue Jun 19 2012 - 14:20:09 EST
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm not opposed to something like this, if people think it's useful.
>
> This patch sets the node quite early, before we even look at the _PXM
> information in pci_acpi_scan_root(). That means if the BIOS does
> supply a _PXM method and the user gives this argument, the
> user-supplied info is silently overwritten. To me it would make more
> sense to handle an option like this *after* we look for _PXM info.
> That way it could be used to compensate for both missing and incorrect
> _PXM info.
yes, we can only let user input and hostbridge touch that array.
but i'd like to only handle missing _PXM case.
If the BIOS provide wrong _PXM, that BIOS really should be fixed at first.
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/