Re: [patch] BFS 420: a tiny step forward

[Emmanuel Benisty]

Hi Hillf,

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Emmanuel
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, the issue is still there.
>>>
>> Hang at same place?
>>
> And try to revert handling CPU_ONLINE, please.
>
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/bfs.c    ÂSat Jun Â2 17:30:28 2012
> +++ b/kernel/sched/bfs.c    ÂThu Jun Â7 20:58:36 2012
> @@ -5352,7 +5352,7 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â/* Update our root-domain */
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âgrq_lock_irqsave(&flags);
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âif (rq->rd) {
> - Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â BUG_ON(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
>
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âset_rq_online(rq);
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â}
> --

Sorry for the late reply. This patch did solve the issue, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/