Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu: Fix rcu_is_cpu_idle() #ifdef inTINY_RCU

[Josh Triplett]

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 03:57:49PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:28:28PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 01:13:15PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > The rcu_is_cpu_idle() function is used if CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC,
> > > but TINY_RCU defines it only when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU.  This causes
> > > build failures when CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y but CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=n.
> > > This commit therefore adjusts the #ifdefs for rcu_is_cpu_idle() so
> > > that it is defined when CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Given that an earlier patch in this series makes rcupdate.h
> > unconditionally prototype rcu_is_cpu_idle, shouldn't rcutiny.c define it
> > unconditionally?  (And do so before the earlier patch in this series
> > makes it available unconditionally?)
> 
> Or update that earlier patch so that it keeps rcu_is_cpu_idle() under
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC.  Either way, good catch!
> 
> Hmmm...  I want it under CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC for TINY_RCU (memory
> footprint and all that), but unconditional for TREE_RCU.  That can
> be arranged...

Seems reasonable to me, as long as the availability of the prototype at
compile time always matches the availability of the function at link
time.

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/