Re: missing leap second patches in stable.

[John Stultz]

On 06/15/2012 08:20 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> Should these be in -stable ? Looks like all the other recent changes
> in that area are present.  With the leap second just two weeks away,
> it seems like they should be.
>
> Looks like 6b43ae8a619d17c4935c3320d2ef9e92bdeed05d is in 3.4-stable,
> (haven't checked earlier -stable trees).

So the second patch has been sent out for stable review as of yesterday. 
So it should be on its way, but you're right that I forgot to CC stable 
on the first TAI offset fix.

I'll generate the patch and send it to Greg.  Thanks for the close 
review here!

thanks
-john

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/