Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core.c Pass voltage to notifier whensetting voltage

[Pankaj Jangra]

Hi,

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Philip Rakity <prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jun 15, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Pankaj Jangra wrote:
>
>> Hi Philip,
>>
>> Just a cosmetic comments.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Philip Rakity <philipspatches@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> V2
>> --
>>
>> Incorporate performance suggestions made by Mark Brown
>> Use linux-next as base code rather than mmc-next
>>
>> The voltage being set should be passed to the handler requesting
>> the callback.  Currently this is not done.
>
> thanks -- my typo when redoing the patch -- V3 has this fixed.
>
>>
>> The callback cannot call regulator_get_voltage() to get the
>> information since the mutex is held by the regulator and
>> deadlock occurs.
>>
>> Without this change the receiver of the notify cannot now what
>>
>> You mean to say "cannot know what" ?
>>
>> action to take.  This is used, for example, to set PAD voltages
>> when doing SD vccq voltage changes.
>
>
> if you call in that receives the notify does not know the new voltage
> then in our case we do not know if we should switch the pad from
> 3.3v to 1.8v for example.  vccq signaling in SD is normally 3.3V
> but in UHS mode it is lowered to 1.8V
>

Yes right. So that means we need to make change in
blocking_notifier_call_chain() too in order to send the voltage back?

Regards,
Pankaj Jangra
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/