Re: AMD FX CPU bug, not fixed by latest microcode?

[Boszormenyi Zoltan]

2012-06-14 00:06 keltezÃssel, Borislav Petkov Ãrta:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:26:07PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> > I did exactly that, the remaining two 8GB modules don't have faults
> > according to memtest86+ and the machine is stable with "make -j8" in
> > the kernel tree. Neither thunderbird nor firefox crashed for a day,
> > these are the usual victims when hitting the bad memory address.
> Cool.
>
> I guess you could try to limit it even further by taking a known-good
> 8GB module and pairing it with one of the "bad" ones to see whether one
> of the "bad" 8GB modules is faulty or both of them are.
>
> Or you could stop wasting time and go buy two new ones :-)

Yesterday I took the bad pair back to the shop with a screenshot
showing memtest86+ results and they accepted it for warranty.
I will get a new pair or RAMs for no extra fee.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/