Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf, x86: Add basic Ivy Bridge support v3

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 12:20 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Very similar to Sandy Bridge, but there is no PEBS problem.
> 
> As Stephane pointed out .code=0xb1, .umask=0x01 is gone, so don't
> do a generic backend stall event on IvyBridge.
> 
> v2: Remove stall event
> v3: Fork init code from Sandy Bridge
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> index 187c294..abb29c2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> @@ -1911,7 +1911,6 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>  	case 42: /* SandyBridge */
>  	case 45: /* SandyBridge, "Romely-EP" */
>  		x86_add_quirk(intel_sandybridge_quirk);
> -	case 58: /* IvyBridge */
>  		memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, snb_hw_cache_event_ids,
>  		       sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
>  
> @@ -1928,11 +1927,31 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>  		/* UOPS_ISSUED.ANY,c=1,i=1 to count stall cycles */
>  		intel_perfmon_event_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_FRONTEND] =
>  			X86_CONFIG(.event=0x0e, .umask=0x01, .inv=1, .cmask=1);
> +		pr_cont("SandyBridge events, ");
> +		break;
> +
> +	case 58: /* IvyBridge */
>  		/* UOPS_DISPATCHED.THREAD,c=1,i=1 to count stall cycles*/
>  		intel_perfmon_event_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND] =
>  			X86_CONFIG(.event=0xb1, .umask=0x01, .inv=1, .cmask=1);
>  
> -		pr_cont("SandyBridge events, ");
> +		memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, snb_hw_cache_event_ids,
> +		       sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
> +
> +		intel_pmu_lbr_init_snb();
> +
> +		x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_snb_event_constraints;
> +		x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_snb_pebs_event_constraints;
> +		x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snb_extra_regs;
> +		/* all extra regs are per-cpu when HT is on */
> +		x86_pmu.er_flags |= ERF_HAS_RSP_1;
> +		x86_pmu.er_flags |= ERF_NO_HT_SHARING;
> +
> +		/* UOPS_ISSUED.ANY,c=1,i=1 to count stall cycles */
> +		intel_perfmon_event_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_FRONTEND] =
> +			X86_CONFIG(.event=0x0e, .umask=0x01, .inv=1, .cmask=1);
> +		/* No backend stall event */
> +		pr_cont("IvyBridge events, ");
>  		break;
>  
>  	default:

I really don't see the point of this patch,.. it is in fact using the
SandyBridge events.. also you appear to have removed the backend stalls
which per SDM (may 2012) table 19-2 would be the very same.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/