Re: File copy is very slow on linux-3.4.2 (or linux-3.3x) on aspecific hardware: AMD FX-8150 + 990FX

From: Jan Kara
Date: Tue Jun 12 2012 - 17:17:55 EST


On Tue 12-06-12 20:39:32, Wallak wrote:
> Jan Kara wrote:
> >On Mon 11-06-12 21:54:16, wallak@xxxxxxx wrote:
> >>I've a very annoying issue on recent kernel (linux-3.4.2-SMP) with my main motherboard (AMD FX-8150 + 990FX - 8 cores 4.1GHz), file copy is very slow (see below). The same kernel works flawlessly on an AMD E450 2 cores motherboard.
> >>
> >>Linux-3.2.20 works properly on this hardware.
> >>hdparm -t gives good results on both kernels.
> >>
> >>I've no idea where this bug come from. Do you have this issue on your hardware ? A patch is available ?
> >>
> >>
> >>*linux-3.4.2
> >>dd if=../in/file_8gb.tmp of=tmp.tmp bs=1024k count=100
> >>100+0 records in
> >>100+0 records out
> >>104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 132.884 s, 789 kB/s
> >>
> >>
> >>*linux-3.2.20
> >>dd if=../in/file_8gb.tmp of=tmp.tmp bs=1024k count=100
> >>100+0 records in
> >>100+0 records out
> >>104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 3.30793 s, 31.7 MB/s
> > So let's separate reading and writing part first. What is the speed of
> >dd if=../in/file_8gb.tmp of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100
> > on both kernels?
> >And what is the speed of:
> >dd if=/dev/zero of=tmp.tm bs=1M count=100
>
> You're right, the issue is only while writing. The results are below:
>
> #linux-3.4.2
> dd if=/dev/zero of=tmp.tm bs=1M count=100
> 100+0 records in
> 100+0 records out
> 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 151.347 s, 693 kB/s
> dd if=../in/file_8gb.tmp of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100
> 100+0 records in
> 100+0 records out
> 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 1.26228 s, 83.1 MB/s
>
> #linux-3.2.20
> dd if=/dev/zero of=tmp.tm bs=1M count=100
> 100+0 records in
> 100+0 records out
> 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 1.00838 s, 104 MB/s
> dd if=../in/file_8gb.tmp of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100
> 100+0 records in
> 100+0 records out
> 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 1.26947 s, 82.6 MB/s
>
>
> >
> > Also what filesystems are you using?
>
> This is an ext2 file system:
>
> /dev/sda6 ext2 464463364 323380956 141082408 70% /backup
OK, I'm surprised by one thing - how come the writes do no end up cached
in memory (thus you should get much higher throughput). Is the filesystem
mounted with -o sync option by any chance?

Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/