Re: [PATCH] kvm: notify host when guest panicked

From: Wen Congyang
Date: Tue Jun 12 2012 - 04:03:07 EST


At 06/12/2012 03:49 PM, Christian Borntraeger Wrote:
>>> We have three solutions to implement this feature:
>>> 1. use vmcall
>>> 2. use I/O port
>>> 3. use virtio-serial.
>>
>>> We have decided to avoid touching hypervisor. The reason why I choose
>>> choose the I/O port is:
>>> 1. it is easier to implememt
>>> 2. it does not depend any virtual device
>>> 3. it can work when startint the kernel
>
> Havent looked deeply into that, butz wouldnt kvm_hypercall0 also fulfill all of these
> points? You just have to define the number for each architecture and then it should be
> possible to write a simple panic driver that works on all architectures.

kvm_hypercall0? Avi said that we should avoid touching hypercall.

Thanks
Wen Congyang

>
>>> --- a/include/linux/kvm_para.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_para.h
>>> @@ -20,6 +20,14 @@
>>> #define KVM_HC_FEATURES 3
>>> #define KVM_HC_PPC_MAP_MAGIC_PAGE 4
>>>
>>> +#define KVM_PV_PORT (0x505UL)
>>> +
>
> ignoring the above, shouldnt a port number go into an architecture specific file?
>
>
> Christian
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/