Re: [PATCH 0/5] Some pstore/ramoops fixes

[Anton Vorontsov]

On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:06:50AM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> In the light of Linus' response, and I said this to Colin already, I'll
> just zap a prz at boot time for pstore/console interface, which means
> that nowadays there shouldn't be any objections to this bunch of fixes.
> 
> These are valid fixes for v3.5, they restore old pstore's behavior
> nuances, which I changed accidentaly.
> 
> Except for the last patch, which is just a fix I happened to make when
> I got bored of the warning. :-) Not a regression fix, though.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> ---
>  fs/pstore/inode.c          |    2 +-
>  fs/pstore/ram.c            |    3 +++
>  fs/pstore/ram_core.c       |   27 +++++++++++++++++----------
>  include/linux/pstore_ram.h |    2 ++
>  4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Hi Greg,

Have you had a chance to look into these? Plus into
"[PATCH v5 0/11] Merge ram_console into pstore" series, I believe
there were no objections as well.

Thanks!

p.s. I must confess I have a huge pile of battery-related patches in
my inbox that I have to review/apply, and folks start to send similar
pings as I send to you now. :-) I should probably start working on
my backlog to improve my karma, hehe.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
Email: cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/