Re: [PATCH 08/22] regulator: Change ab8500 match names to reflectDevice Tree
From: Mark Brown
Date: Mon Jun 11 2012 - 07:43:07 EST
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:28:57PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On 11/06/12 11:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> >Suppose you have two devices of the same type with an array of name
> >based regulators, meaning the nodes with constraints have to have a
> >particular name in order to be matched to the regulator. How would a
> >consumer reference a node to specify a supply?
> some-regulators {
> compatible = "protect_me_from_similarly_named_regulators";
>
> regulator_node_name_reg: regulator_node_name {
> <blah>
> };
> };
> [supply_name]-supply = <®ulator_node_name>;
I'm not 100% sure you read what I wrote above or in all the previous
mails about having two devices of the same type? The case where we have
only one regulator of a given type obviously works otherwise people
would have noticed, the problem starts when you have two of the same
regulator device down.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature