Re: [PATCH -V6 07/14] memcg: Add HugeTLB extension

From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
Date: Sun Jun 10 2012 - 11:04:53 EST


On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 06:55:30PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
> > David Rientjes didn't like HugetTLB limit to be a memcg extension and
> > wanted this to be a separate controller. I posted a v7 version that did
> > HugeTLB limit as a separate controller and used page cgroup to track
> > HugeTLB cgroup. Kamezawa Hiroyuki didn't like the usage of page_cgroup
> > in HugeTLB controller( http://mid.gmane.org/4FCD648E.90709@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx )
> >
>
> Yes, and thank you very much for working on v8 to remove the dependency on
> page_cgroup and to seperate this out. I think it will benefit users who
> don't want to enable all of memcg but still want to account and restrict
> hugetlb page usage, and I think the code seperation is much cleaner
> internally.
>

I have V9 ready to post. Only change I have against v8 is to fix the compund_order
comparison and folding the charge/uncharge patches with its users. I will wait for
your review feedback before posting V9 so that I can address the review comments
in V9. Once we get V9 out we can get the series added to -mm ?

> I'll review that patchset and suggest that the old hugetlb extension in
> -mm be dropped in the interim.
>

I also agree with dropping the old hugetlb extension patchset in -mm.

-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/