Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dt: tegra: cardhu: register core regulator tps65911

[Laxman Dewangan]

On Saturday 02 June 2012 12:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> We could either augment struct of_regulator_match with an integer ID
> field for each regulator (which would perhaps make it slightly painful
> to write the nodes and keep the IDs matched up), or add a new property
> to each regulator provider node e.g. regulator-id which contained the
> name that the regulator driver knows the regulator as (which would match
> struct of_regulator_match.name), since the existing regulator-name
> property is used for semantically different purposes.
>
> That would result in:
>
> > tps65911: tps65911@2d {
> > 	compatible = "ti,tps65911";
> > 	reg =<0x2d>;
> >
> > 	#gpio-cells =<2>;
> > 	gpio-controller;
> >
> > 	regulators {
> > 		#address-cells =<1>;
> > 		#size-cells =<0>;
> >
> > 		vdd1_reg: regulator@0 {
> > 			reg =<0>;
> > 			regulator-id = "vdd1"; /* Internal name */
> > 			regulator-name = "vdd_1v2_gen"; /* Signal on schematic */
> ...
> > 		};
> >
> > 		vdd2_reg: regulator@1 {
> > 			reg =<1>;
> > 			regulator-id = "vdd2";
> > 			regulator-name = "vdd_1v5_gen";
> ...


So is it fine to go on the above binding?
In this case we need to find the match_regulator based on regulator-id 
rather than by name.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/