Re: [PATCH] perf/x86: check ucode before disabling PEBS onSandyBridge

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 20:05 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> How about this: since the ucode cannot be downgraded and since higher
> ucode versions are supposed to fix current and older problems (otherwise
> ucoders will get an earlfull) you shouldn't be needing to verify the
> ucode version on all CPUs per-CPU, i.e. the O(n^2) overhead.
> 
> Rather, simply track which CPUs _haven't_ been updated yet, and once
> this is the empty set, run the verify thing to check ucode version on
> all CPUs.
> 
> And this should happen only when we update ucode from version A to
> version B, where B > A.
> 
> And unless I'm missing something, this should be O(n) and ucode update
> should happen very seldomly anyway. 

Checking a bitmap of n bits for being all zero is O(n), so the total is
still O(n^2). Still, probably faster than the for_each_online_cpu() scan
I do now.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/