Re: processes hung after sys_renameat, and 'missing' processes

[Dave Jones]

On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:31:38AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

 > > Can you check the compile error that Dave reported for
 > > your patch, because right now Dave is running without it, afaik, due
 > > to your lock-instance patch not really working in practice.
 > 
 > Oh, missed that in the thread.. yeah here goes.
 > 
 > Now also compile tested with CONFIG_LOCK_STAT...

Doesn't apply against Linus' current tree.

$ cat ../lock| patch -p1
patching file include/linux/lockdep.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 211.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 254.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 363.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 414.
4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/lockdep.h.rej
patching file include/trace/events/lock.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 61.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 78.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/trace/events/lock.h.rej
patching file kernel/lockdep.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 541.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 556 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 3093.
patch: **** malformed patch at line 268: ck,


	Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/