Re: um: TTY fixes (?)

From: Richard Weinberger
Date: Thu Jun 07 2012 - 05:06:10 EST


Am 07.06.2012 11:19, schrieb Alan Cox:
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 01:17:24 +0200
> Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Am 04.06.2012 23:17, schrieb Alan Cox:
>>> We can half ignore it on console for the simple reason that you
>>> don't "dial in" to the console. I suspect it may be abusable but
>>> I've not found a way to do so.
>>>
>>
>> BTW: Can't we add such a mode to tty_port?
>> E.g. tty_port->non_dialin_console. 8)
>
> That is basically what you are doing when you omit a hangup method. The
> security consequences on a multi-user box run deeper however so in the
> end we need to fix the util-linux code.

Okay, than I have to find out why getty does not start if I omit ->hangup.

Thanks,
//richard


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature