Re: [PATCH] printk: Shrink printk_sched buffer size, eliminate itwhen !CONFIG_PRINTK

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed Jun 06 2012 - 03:33:22 EST



* Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The size of the per-cpu printk_sched buf is much larger
> than necessary. The maximum sched message emitted is
> ~80 bytes. Shrink the allocation for this printk_sched
> buffer from 512 bytes to 128.
>
> printk_sched creates an unnecessary per-cpu buffer when
> CONFIG_PRINTK is not enabled. Remove it when appropriate
> so embedded uses save a bit of space too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/printk.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c
> index 32462d2..61cff0b 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk.c
> @@ -1726,24 +1726,30 @@ int is_console_locked(void)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Delayed printk version, for scheduler-internal messages:
> + * Delayed printk version, for scheduler-internal messages.
> + * Not the normal 512 as it's a bit wasteful, sched messages are short,
> + * and 128 is more than sufficient for all current messages.
> */
> -#define PRINTK_BUF_SIZE 512
> +#define PRINTK_SCHED_BUF_SIZE 128
>
> #define PRINTK_PENDING_WAKEUP 0x01
> #define PRINTK_PENDING_SCHED 0x02
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, printk_pending);
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char [PRINTK_BUF_SIZE], printk_sched_buf);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char [PRINTK_SCHED_BUF_SIZE], printk_sched_buf);
> +#endif
>
> void printk_tick(void)
> {
> if (__this_cpu_read(printk_pending)) {
> int pending = __this_cpu_xchg(printk_pending, 0);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK
> if (pending & PRINTK_PENDING_SCHED) {
> char *buf = __get_cpu_var(printk_sched_buf);
> printk(KERN_WARNING "[sched_delayed] %s", buf);
> }
> +#endif
> if (pending & PRINTK_PENDING_WAKEUP)
> wake_up_interruptible(&log_wait);
> }
> @@ -2189,7 +2195,7 @@ int printk_sched(const char *fmt, ...)
> buf = __get_cpu_var(printk_sched_buf);
>
> va_start(args, fmt);
> - r = vsnprintf(buf, PRINTK_BUF_SIZE, fmt, args);
> + r = vsnprintf(buf, PRINTK_SCHED_BUF_SIZE, fmt, args);
> va_end(args);
>
> __this_cpu_or(printk_pending, PRINTK_PENDING_SCHED);

The change makes sense but the further proliferation of #ifdefs
is rather ugly and shows confusion: fundamentally, if we are
going to cut out more printk functionality in the !CONFIG_PRINTK
we might as well disable the whole thing, not just the
printk_sched bits.

Thanks,

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/