Re: [PATCH RFC] c_can_pci: generic module for c_can on PCI

[Alan Cox]

> +enum c_can_pci_reg_align {
> +	C_CAN_REG_ALIGN_16,
> +	C_CAN_REG_ALIGN_32,
> +};

Anythign wrong with 

bool aligned32;

> +
> +struct c_can_pci_data {
> +	unsigned int reg_align;	/* Set the register alignment in the memory */

Not the enum .. indeed

> +static u16 c_can_pci_read_reg_aligned_to_16bit(struct c_can_priv *priv,
> +						void *reg)

I'm a bit worried this function name might be too short ;)


> +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s device registered (regs=%p, irq=%d)\n",
> +		 KBUILD_MODNAME, priv->regs, dev->irq);

dev_dbg

> +	 * do not call pci_disable_device on sta2x11 because it
> +	 * break all other Bus masters on this EP
> +	 */
> +	if(pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_STMICRO &&
> +	   pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_STMICRO_CAN)
> +		goto out;

Is that the disabling or the dropping it into D3. We have a PCI quirk
flag for the latter. See "quirk_no_ata_d3". That will also avoid any
accidents elsewhere. Right now the quirk has "ata" in the name but the
ata is just historically because we had to quirk various disk controllers.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/