Re: [RFC PATCH -tip 1/9] ftrace: Add pt_regs acceptable tracecallback

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 21:48 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:

>  struct ftrace_ops {
> -	ftrace_func_t			func;
> +	union {
> +		ftrace_func_t			func;
> +		ftrace_regs_func_t		regs_func;
> +	};
>  	struct ftrace_ops		*next;
>  	unsigned long			flags;
>  	int __percpu			*disabled;
> @@ -164,6 +182,7 @@ static inline int ftrace_function_local_disabled(struct ftrace_ops *ops)
>  }

[..]

>  
>  static struct ftrace_ops global_ops = {
> -	.func			= ftrace_stub,
> +	.regs_func		= ftrace_regs_stub,
>  	.notrace_hash		= EMPTY_HASH,
>  	.filter_hash		= EMPTY_HASH,
> +	.flags			= FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS,
>  };
>  
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(ftrace_regex_lock);
> @@ -3911,7 +3924,8 @@ void __init ftrace_init(void)
>  #else
>  
>  static struct ftrace_ops global_ops = {
> -	.func			= ftrace_stub,
> +	.regs_func		= ftrace_regs_stub,
> +	.flags			= FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS,
>  };
>  

Ug, this wont compile with some versions of gcc :-(

The one I stumbled on is gcc 4.5.1 (which I test builds against 4.5.1
and 4.6.0). Then I saw this BZ:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10676

This can't be a union :-(  Then we can not initialize it.

I may go with my old approach and just change all callers to have a regs
parameter.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/