[PATCH 4/5] reiserfs: mark the superblock as dirty a bit later

From: Artem Bityutskiy
Date: Fri Jun 01 2012 - 10:17:00 EST


From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The 'journal_mark_dirty()' function currently first marks the superblock as
dirty by setting 's_dirt' to 1, then does various sanity checks and returns,
then actuall does all the magic with the journal.

This is not an ideal order, though. It makes more sense to first do all the
checks, then do all the internal stuff, and at the end notify the VFS that the
superblock is now dirty.

This patch moves the 's_dirt = 1' assignment from the very beginning of this
function to the very end.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/reiserfs/journal.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
index 68aea62..e5e06dd 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
@@ -3231,8 +3231,6 @@ int journal_mark_dirty(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
th->t_trans_id, journal->j_trans_id);
}

- sb->s_dirt = 1;
-
prepared = test_clear_buffer_journal_prepared(bh);
clear_buffer_journal_restore_dirty(bh);
/* already in this transaction, we are done */
@@ -3316,6 +3314,7 @@ int journal_mark_dirty(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
journal->j_first = cn;
journal->j_last = cn;
}
+ sb->s_dirt = 1;
return 0;
}

--
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/